Cajon Pass Borehole Seismic Recording - Instrumentation Data Submitted to IRIS April 1997 Rachel Abercrombie University of Southern California (Now at: Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, 32 Salamanca Road, PO Box 1320, Wellington, New Zealand; Email: R.Abercrombie@gns.cri.nz) 1 April 1997 This document describes the Cajon Pass borehole seismic recording, including the instrument responses, timing and other relevant information concerning the earthquake data recorded during this project. The results have been published in a number of papers which also include further information about the experiment and instruments used. Description of Experiment Deep seismic recording began at Cajon Pass in August 1991 when Peter Leary and Derek Manov (University of Southern California) installed a triaxial set of geophones at 2.5 km depth. These instruments continued to record until August 1993, and a surface instrument was also deployed during 1992. Phase II recording with instruments at the surface, 300 m, 1.5 and 2.9 km began in November 1993 and the instruments were withdrawn in August 1995. Only Phase II was performed using IRIS instruments and so only Phase II is archived here (Julian days 326 1993 to 286 1994). If you would like data from Phase I then please contact Rachel Abercrombie directly. The Cajon Pass Scientific Drillhole (also known as the DOSECC hole) was drilled in the late 1980’s to investigate the state of stress and heat flow along the San Andreas Fault. Volume 15 of Geophysical Research Letters (August 1988) and volume 97 of Journal of Geophysical Research (April 1992) contain selections of papers related to the borehole. The top of the hole is at 34.3144 N, 117.4772 W, 960 m above sea level. Description of Data The data are in the form of RefTek SEGY triggered event files, all 60 s long. The files have all been compressed using the UNIX compress command. No timing corrections have been implied to any of the data (see the Summary below for details of when a clock was running - all recording took place in UT). Triggering always took place on a borehole sensor and so false triggers only arise from electronic problems (e. g. water in the connectors) and not from external noise sources. All triggers have been kept. The data were sent to IRIS on a DAT tape (928 megabytes). The tape also includes (a) a tape list (tape.list), (b) an event catalogue (cajon.cat) in the format described below, and (c) README (which contains this text in ascii), README.RTF (which contains this text in RTF format) and README.DOC (which contains this text in Microsoft Word 6 for Windows) files. Significant Earthquakes During Recording Period 17 January 1994, Northridge earthquake: The array was not recording during the mainshock but many aftershocks were recorded. Bibliography of Work to Date from this Experiment Abercrombie, R. E. and Leary, P. C. (1993) Source parameters of small earthquakes recorded at 2.5 km depth, Cajon Pass, southern California: implications for earthquake scaling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1511- 1514. Leary, P. C. and Abercrombie, R. E. (1994a) Frequency dependent crustal scattering and absorption at 5 - 160 Hz from coda decay observed at 2.5 km depth, Geophys. Res. Lett, 21, 971-974. Leary, P. C. and Abercrombie, R. E. (1994b) Fractal fracture scattering origin of S wave coda: spectral evidence from recordings at 2.5 km, Geophys. Res. Lett, 21, 1683-1686. Abercrombie, R. E. (1995a) Earthquake locations using single station deep borehole recordings: implications for microseismicity on the San Andreas fault in southern California, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 24003- 24014. Abercrombie, R. E. (1995b) Earthquake source scaling relationships from -1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5 km depth, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 24015-24036. Abercrombie, R. E. (1996) The magnitude-frequency distribution of earthquakes recorded with deep seismometers at Cajon Pass, southern California, Tectonophysics, 261, 1-7. Manov, D. V., Abercrombie, R. E. and Leary, P. C. (1995) Reliable and economical high temperature deep borehole seismic recording, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 204-211. Abercrombie, R. E. (1997) Near surface attenuation and site effects from comparison of surface and deep borehole recordings, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., June, in press. Adams, D. A. and R. E. Abercrombie (1997). Seismic attenuation at high frequencies in southern California from coda waves recorded at a range of depths, J. Geophys. Res., in prep. CAJON PASS PHASE II - SUMMARY Dates and times in California Local Time 1993 325 Nov 21 seismometers installed - 60 Hz from junction box (3 km = RefTek 028, 1.5 km = RefTek 027, Surface and 300 m = RefTek 029. On RefTek 029, Surface = channels 1,2,3 and 300 m = channels 4,5,6) 1993 328 Nov 28 Put to event trigger on 1.5 km and 300/0 m - No relative timing 1993 334 Nov 30 Reinstalled junction box. Timing good on all levels. Some waveform problems (e.g. 60 Hz and calibration type pulse) on some channels 1994 007 Jan 7 RefTeks removed for testing 1994 019 Jan 19 RefTeks installed again, 1.5 km now 028 (surface and 300 m on 029), no 3 km 2 RefTeks triggering together - good timing 1994 028 Jan 28 separate triggering on 2 RefTeks, clock only on 1.5 km 1994 031 Jan 31 RefTek 027 connected to 3 km, separate triggering, clock only on 1.5 km wrong trigger parameters on 3 and 1.5 km -> weird recording 1994 044 Feb 13 GPS stolen -> no clock ... 1994 054 Feb 23 Corrected triggering channel parameters on 3 and 1.5 km Still no clock 1994 059 Feb 28 Corrected triggering channel parameters on surface and 300 m, not a real problem Still no clock 1994 123 May 2 Found 3 km wet. Could not dry properly. Still no clock 1994 131 May 11 Dried out 3 km, connected new GPS to 1.5 km Good timing on 1.5 km, not on others. 1994 147 May 27 New RefTek junction box. All RefTeks connected, all RefTeks have GPS time 1994 182 Jul 1 RefTek 027 removed from 3 km, DC offset Channel 1 deteriorating to this date on 3 km 1994 211 Jul 30 3 km RefTek 027 reinstalled, channel 1 fixed BUT RefTek not working so no data recorded at 3 km Good timing on all levels still. 1994 216 Aug 4 L22-D 2 Hz installed on granite site near Cajon Pass hole 1994 222 Aug 10 Cables cut at 04.40 hrs GMT 1994 224 Aug 12 Discovered cables cut to 3 and 1.5 km All borehole RefTeks brought to lab. Granite site fine 1994 234 Aug 22 Got borehole array working again!! All 5 stations working well with timing from this date! 1994 264 Sep 20 RefTek 029 (surface + 300 m) ran out of power 1994 256 Sep 12 Granite site RefTek blew a fuse. 1994 267 Sep 23 Granite site pulled out. 1994 270 Sep 26 Visited borehole and gave new batteries. All 4 levels working. 1994 286 Oct 13 Visited borehole. All levels working. Brought all RefTeks back to USC as no replacement batteries and also some water on RefTeks 1994 297 Oct 24 Reinstalled all levels for LARSE onshore shots 1994 313 Nov 9 Retrieved all RefTeks and clock and left for the winter Event Catalogue All earthquakes recorded at 1.5 km, up to and including day 286, 1994, have been picked and catalogued and are included on the tape in the file cajon.cat A description of the cataloguing process is given in Abercrombie (1996) Format: format i4,1x,i3,1x,i3,1x, i2,i2,f6.3,1x,2(i6,1x),3(i5,1x), read iyr, jday, itrig, th,tm,ts, Pt,St, Az,Ah1,Ah2, -- a6,1x, i6,1x, a1, f3.1, a30 -- polarity, coda, comm1, mli, comment Explanation: iyr Year of event jday Julian day of event itrig Number of trigger at 1.5 km on jday th Hour of event trigger (note that timing is not always correct - see above) tm Minute of event trigger ts Second of event trigger Pt P time pick measured from trigger time (milliseconds) St S time pick measured from trigger time (milliseconds) Az Max amplitude on vertical component (counts) Ah1 Max amplitude on 1st horizontal (h1) component (counts) Ah2 Max amplitude on 2nd horizontal (h2) component (counts) polarity 3 component P and S polarities (P on Z,H1,H2, S on Z,H1,H2) up:down = +:- for P; *:/ for S. coda Time at which coda on H1 reaches approximately 3 times background (milliseconds after trigger time) comm1 M - prefix to magnitude from SCSN mli SCSN magnitude where available (some events may be missed) comment Various comments - includes SCSN CUSPID if available. Also used to identify “ringers” - strange high frequency events which may be nearfield radiation or something else (e. g. cable slip). No S is seen for these events. Table 1: Cajon Pass Instrument Characteristics. Depth Operation Dates Gain Sample Instrument Vertical Horizontal 1 Horizontal 2 Polarity Comments Rate (/s) G (V/in/s) fc (Hz) D G (V/in/s) fc (Hz) D G (V/in/s) fc (Hz) D Surface April 1992 - July 19923 8 250 L22-D 2 Hz 0.86 2 0.46 0.86 2 0.46 0.86 2 0.46 Z = up, H1 = W (±3 ), H2 = N (±3 ) General instrument specifications. Accurate timing relative to 2.5 km, not absolute time. 2.5 km April 1992 - August 19933 5126 5006 L-15LA-TW-HT 10 Hz 0.65 10 0.7 0.65 10 0.7 0.65 10 0.7 Z = up, H1 = 18 (±3 ), H2 = 72 (±3 )7 General instrument specifications. No absolute time (accuracy ± 5 s) Surface November 1993 - August 19954 8 250 L22-D 2 Hz 0.968 2.533 0.433 0.960 2.064 0.458 0.988 2.060 0.495 Z = up, H1 = N, H2 = E Measured in situ2 300 m November 1993 - August 1995 32 500 L1-B 4.5 Hz 4.765 4.114 0.945 5.105 4.297 0.725 4.346 4.423 1.284 Z = up, H1 ~ -10 (±10 ), H2 ~ -100 (±10 )8 Measured in situ 1.5 km November 1993 - August 1995 512 1000 L-15LA-TW-HT 10 Hz 0.615 10.977 0.583 0.602 10.593 0.597 0.617 11.211 0.606 Z = up, H1 ~ 142 (±5 ), H2 ~ 50 (±5 ) Measured in situ 2.9 km November 1993 - August 1995 512 1000 L-15LA-TW-HT 10 Hz 0.526 10.471 0.565 0.551 10.309 0.534 0.513 10.111 0.535 Z = up, H1~ 115 (±10 ), H2 ~ 25 (±10 ) Measured in situ Granite9 August 1994 - September 1994 8 250 L22-D 2 Hz 0.876 2 0.72 0.870 2 0.72 0.873 2 0.72 Z = up, H1 = N, H2 = E G from measured geophone coil resistances Notes: 1. All Instruments (Mark Products Geophones) are run on 16 bit RefTeks, with full scale ±3.75 V. G is the generator constant, fc is the geophone corner frequency and D is the damping factor. 2. In situ calibration in May 1994 and June 1995 using the technique developed by Rodgers et al. (1995). The calibrations showed negligible changes in the response of the geophones, after 11 months at elevated temperatures, within the errors of the calibration system (in this case < 5%, A. Martin, pers. comm.) 3. Phase I operation. The 2.5 km instrument was installed in August 1991 but recording prior to April 1992 was in short periods using a USC made recording system. Down time in April due to water problems in the recording system. No RefTek 26 July to 2 September 1992, so no recording. Downtime during winter on account of water getting into RefTeks as site flooded following rain. 4. Phase II operation. A summary of the second phase of recording follows. 5. All data was recorded on field exabyte tapes. Then it was loaded onto the SUN using ref2segy, and the RefTek SEGY files were backed up in duplicate using TAR onto exabyte tapes. These data were compressed and loaded onto one DAT tape to send to IRIS. 6. Gain increased to 2048 and sample rate to 1000 between 27 January and 7 March 1993. 7. Determination of 2.5 km horizontal orientation in Abercrombie (1995a). Note North = 0 , East = 90 etc. 8. Borehole horizontal orientations in Phase II are estimated by the same method described in Abercrombie (1995a). The angles are preliminary using only a small number of earthquakes. 9. The “granite” instrument was installed on hard granite with plaster of Paris. Location: 34.3113 N, 117.4625 W.