A forum for SAC users to exchange ideas and ask questions about SAC usage, installation, portability, etc.
This mailing list has moved to https://groups.google.com/a/earthscope.org/g/sac-community.
- Email address
- sac-help@lists.ds.iris.edu
- Type
-
Help
Help lists are for submitting support questions. Anyone can post a question for IRIS (or another team) to answer.
- Moderated by
- IRIS Webmaster
- Related tags
- SAC Software SAC
Active Message Threads for August 2016

2016-08-24 15:57:20
- 2016-08-26 16:07:17
Is there a standard bibliographic attribution for IRIS software? I have one for the DMC, but that is very general.
Preference or a link?
Thanks,
Mike Padgett
Replies
-
Re: Bibliographic attribution needed for the SAC, JSeed, and RDSeed software - adam@iris.washington.edu - 2016-08-26 16:07:17
So could you plz provide you script?
发自 网易邮箱大师
On 08/05/2016 20:56, Shahar Barak wrote:
OK, I found the weighting factor in the ADDSTACK command.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Shahar Barak <shaharb@stanford.edu> wrote:
Hi,
I want to stack seismograms (receiver-functions) into ray parameter and back-azimuth bins.
Unless you guys recommend otherwise, I think I should use sumstack in the SSS subprocess. The sumstack command says you can "turn normalization option on or off. When this opt…
[more]
No replies

2016-08-05 20:39:43
- 2016-08-05 20:55:08
Hi,
I want to stack seismograms (receiver-functions) into ray parameter and
back-azimuth bins.
1. Unless you guys recommend otherwise, I think I should use *sumstack *in
the *SSS *subprocess. The *sumstack *command says you can *"turn
normalization option on or off. When this option is on the resulting
summation is normalized by dividing each point by a factor that is the sum
of each file's weight*." Where is this weight stored and how do I change
it? It doesn't say in the d…
[more]
Replies
-
Re: Stacking seismograms in bins of backazimuth and slowness - Shahar Barak - 2016-08-05 20:55:08