Dear all,
I agree with Apostolos Agalos. I also think the Constant should be derived from the
multiplication of the Sensitivity with A0.
I think the following method should be right when calculating the CONSTANT.
CONSTANT=A0×Sensor Sesivity × Digitiser Gain × 2*pi
here A0 is in rad/sec Unit,Digitiser Gain is V/ms.
-
Dear All -
Whether you want to include gain and sensitivity in your polezero
CONSTANT is a matter of choice. It depends on how clearly you want to
separate the frequency dependent from the frequency independent parts
of the response. My suggestion was to put the frequency dependent part
into the polezero CONSTANT value. If you choose to do this, you can
use the SCALE header field to include the frequency independent parts
of the gain.
On 14 Nov 2007, at 11:18, FANG Lihua wrote:
Dear all,
George Helffrich
I agree with Apostolos Agalos. I also think the Constant should be
derived from the
multiplication of the Sensitivity with A0.
I think the following method should be right when calculating the
CONSTANT.
CONSTANT=A0×Sensor Sesivity × Digitiser Gain × 2*pi
here A0 is in rad/sec Unit,Digitiser Gain is V/ms.
万 名 青 春 美 少 女 参 加 网 易 校 园 美 女 大 赛 !!>>
_______________________________________________
sac-help mailing list
sac-help<at>iris.washington.edu
http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/sac-help
george<at>geology.bristol.ac.uk