Paula Koelemeijer
2017-01-18 01:39:24
To whom it may concern,
I have been looking at data from station HRV in the IU network:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV
I noticed that in the time span from December 2013 to January 2014, the
BH2 and BHZ components seem wrong, when looking at the dip and azimuth
of the channels:
For BH2 it seems to have the attributes of a vertical component:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV/00/BH2?timewindow=2013/12/19%2001:00:00-2014/01/16%2020:32:00
For BHZ it seems to have the attributes of a horizontal component:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV/00/BHZ?timewindow=2013/12/19%2001:00:00-2014/01/16%2020:32:00
I haven't been able to find anything about this on the webpages, or in
the DPR.
My question is therefore; are the components actually swapped? And is
this corrected for in the stationXML file? Or has this been a typo
between a "Z" and a "2"?
And my other question, more in general: when stations have components
BH1 and BH2, is it safe to assume (at least within data downloaded from
the DMC) that these correspond to the North and East components
respectively? Or should one really look at the dip and azimuth of the
channels, also when processing large datasets?
The webpages only say that IRIS uses the SEED convenction from the
appendix A in the manual, but that doesn't provide many more insights.
Many thanks, and best wishes,
Paula Koelemeijer
I have been looking at data from station HRV in the IU network:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV
I noticed that in the time span from December 2013 to January 2014, the
BH2 and BHZ components seem wrong, when looking at the dip and azimuth
of the channels:
For BH2 it seems to have the attributes of a vertical component:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV/00/BH2?timewindow=2013/12/19%2001:00:00-2014/01/16%2020:32:00
For BHZ it seems to have the attributes of a horizontal component:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV/00/BHZ?timewindow=2013/12/19%2001:00:00-2014/01/16%2020:32:00
I haven't been able to find anything about this on the webpages, or in
the DPR.
My question is therefore; are the components actually swapped? And is
this corrected for in the stationXML file? Or has this been a typo
between a "Z" and a "2"?
And my other question, more in general: when stations have components
BH1 and BH2, is it safe to assume (at least within data downloaded from
the DMC) that these correspond to the North and East components
respectively? Or should one really look at the dip and azimuth of the
channels, also when processing large datasets?
The webpages only say that IRIS uses the SEED convenction from the
appendix A in the manual, but that doesn't provide many more insights.
Many thanks, and best wishes,
Paula Koelemeijer
-
Mary Templeton2017-01-17 19:04:12Hi Paula,
Thanks for your email!
On Jan 17, 2017, at 10:43 AM, Paula Koelemeijer <paula.koelemeijer<at>univ.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
Yes, the network operator has confirmed to us that channels 2 and Z were in
To whom it may concern,
I have been looking at data from station HRV in the IU network:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV
I noticed that in the time span from December 2013 to January 2014, the
BH2 and BHZ components seem wrong, when looking at the dip and azimuth
of the channels:
For BH2 it seems to have the attributes of a vertical component:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV/00/BH2?timewindow=2013/12/19%2001:00:00-2014/01/16%2020:32:00
For BHZ it seems to have the attributes of a horizontal component:
http://ds.iris.edu/mda/IU/HRV/00/BHZ?timewindow=2013/12/19%2001:00:00-2014/01/16%2020:32:00
I haven't been able to find anything about this on the webpages, or in
the DPR.
My question is therefore; are the components actually swapped?
fact reversed as described in the metadata.
And is
It’s not a typo. The metadata is describes the reversal correctly according to the
this corrected for in the stationXML file? Or has this been a typo
between a "Z" and a "2”?
network operator.
And my other question, more in general: when stations have components
Different networks may treat this differently, so I would always consult the
BH1 and BH2, is it safe to assume (at least within data downloaded from
the DMC) that these correspond to the North and East components
respectively?
Or should one really look at the dip and azimuth of the
channels, also when processing large datasets?
metadata. It’s the GSN’s convention that, if you think of the default “N”
and “E” as Y and X in cartesian coordinates, 1 is equivalent to Y. (Note
that if Y is oriented W and X is oriented N, 1 will be W and 2 will be N.)
But I have known other networks who archive data at the DMC that use
the reverse convention (Y=2, X=1).
The webpages only say that IRIS uses the SEED convenction from the
The best insight is to consult the metadata in each case…
appendix A in the manual, but that doesn't provide many more insights.
cheers,
Mary
Many thanks, and best wishes,
Paula Koelemeijer
----------------------
Report a QA Issue (http://ds.iris.edu/message-center/topic/qa-issues/)
Sent from the IRIS Message Center (http://ds.iris.edu/message-center/)
Update subscription preferences at http://ds.iris.edu/account/profile/