[webservices] will the real stationXML please stand up
Shang-Lin Chen
schen at gps.caltech.edu
Fri Oct 21 11:29:28 PDT 2011
The revised sample XML files are online at
http://www.data.scec.org/xml/station/. The CI stations and the CI.BAR
channels are still under the same name. The response XML has been
renamed to http://www.data.scec.org/xml/station/samples/CI_BAR_BH_resp.xml.
Shang-Lin
Ellen Yu wrote:
> Phillip,
>
> We are hoping that we will only need to make minor revisions. We
> definitely would like any feedback as we realize there may be
> unforeseen issues that only will be shook out as people start to use
> the format.
>
> We are going to release a new version that has <any> elements to allow
> people to add additional information not included in StationXML. You
> can find it at
> http://www.data.scec.org/xml/station/20111019/station.xsd
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ellen
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Philip Crotwell <crotwell at seis.sc.edu
> <mailto:crotwell at seis.sc.edu>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Glad to hear that. If I find more issues I will send them in to
> the list.
>
> The changes need to make CI_stations.xml valid is very minor, just
> replace NumberChannels with TotalNumberChannels. The changes to
> CI_BAR_resp.xml are more extensive, so perhaps removing that example
> would be a good idea. Or pull a CI.BAR resp xml from the IRIS web
> service. There still needs to be some hand editing to make it valid,
> but much less than on the existing file. Just a thought.
>
> How big of a revision to the stationXML schema do you anticipate? Is
> this a major reworking or just a minor cleaning up of loose ends? Do
> you have a draft revision yet? Would you be interested in comments on
> the new version as well? As I am actively writing software to process
> stationXML, I might have a useful perspective.
>
> Thanks,
> Philip
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Ellen Yu <eyu at gps.caltech.edu
> <mailto:eyu at gps.caltech.edu>> wrote:
> > Hi Phillip,
> >
> > As part of the stationXML working group I want to tell you we
> are receiving
> > your comments and processing them. It's true the examples are
> not up to
> > date with the schema and we are working on getting them
> updated. Maybe we
> > should take those down in the meantime. I believe everyone who
> is working
> > on the schema is on this list so this is an appropriate place to
> post.
> >
> >
> > Ellen
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> webservices mailing list
> webservices at iris.washington.edu
> <mailto:webservices at iris.washington.edu>
> http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/webservices
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> webservices mailing list
> webservices at iris.washington.edu
> http://www.iris.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/webservices
>
--
Shang-Lin Chen
Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC)
System administrator/Programmer
http://www.data.scec.org
More information about the webservices
mailing list